If you were served with an "ex parte" stalking protective order for a hearing in Salt Lake City or throughout Utah, then you only have 10 days to request a hearing to dispute the order. If the allegations are false or exaggerated, then you can retain an experienced attorney in Salt Lake City, UT, to help you request a hearing within that 10 days period.
An attorney can help you file the request for hearing in a stalking injunction case so that the court will schedule a hearing. At the hearing, your attorney can explain all of the reasons why you disagree with the allegations contained in the Temporary Civil Stalking Injunction.
The attorney will then represent you at the hearing date to show that the stalking protective order should not be granted. At the hearing, the judge will listen to both sides, hear testimony from witnesses, and then will decide whether to dismiss the civil stalking injunction or not.
If you do nothing to contest the allegations, then the stalking protective order will stay in place and the temporary injunction automatically becomes a civil stalking injunction. Under Utah law, the civil stalking injunction will be in effect for three years from the date of service of the temporary injunction.
The respondent does not receive any additional notice that the temporary order has turned into a civil stalking injunction. If it is alleged that you disobeyed a civil stalking injunction may be arrested and prosecuted for the crime of stalking or you could be held in contempt of court.
If you were served with a Request for Civil Stalking Injunction, then contact a lawyer in Salt Lake City, Utah, at Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat, LLP to discuss the allegations and the best ways to protect your rights.
An attorney can help you prepare for the hearing to show why a civil stalking injunction should not be entered against you. A Salt Lake City criminal defense lawyer can help you dispute the evidence against and bring evidence to refute the allegations including police reports, witnesses, audio or videotapes, other records, photos and letters.
An attorney can help you contest the case on jurisdictional grounds. Other defenses include a showing of a lack of corroborating evidence or insufficient evidence to show stalking because:
Let us put our experience to work for you. Call (801) 532-5297 today.
Utah Civil Stalking Injunction Information Center
Back to top
If the petitioner alleges that he or she believes that they are the victim of stalking, the petitioner may file a request for a civil stalking injunction. A minor child with his or her parent or guardian may file a request on his or her own behalf, or a parent, guardian, or custodian may file a petition on the minor child’s behalf.
To initiate the process, the petitioner will file documents with the district court of the county in Utah where either the petitioner or the respondent resides, or where the events occurred. The judge will review the request for the civil stalking injunction and supporting evidence. The court can either grant a temporary civil stalking injunction or deny the request based on the one-sided allegations.
If the court finds that there is a basis for granting the injunction, the court will issue a temporary or "ex parte" order. The sheriff or constable will then serve a copy of the order to the respondent. The order becomes effective once it is served on the respondent.
After being served with the “ex parte” order, the respondent only has 10 days to request a hearing to dispute the order. If the respondent requests a hearing within the ten (10) days, then the court will notify the petitioner and the respondent of the hearing date.
Back to top
Within 10 days of being served, if the respondent requests a hearing to contest the civil stalking injunction, then the petitioner must prove to the court why the stalking injunction is needed. The petitioner must bring to court whatever evidence they think supports the allegations.
The respondent can also bring to court evidence to show that the allegations are false and that the stalking protective order is not needed.
At the hearing, the judge will listen to both sides and then will decide whether to dismiss the temporary stalking injunction, make the temporary injunction a civil stalking injunction which will last for three years, or modify (change) the temporary injunction, and make it effective for three years.
Back to top
The court can decide not to grant the Petitioner's Request for a Civil Stalking Injunction for a variety of reasons including because:
If the court decides to issue a denial fo the Civil Stalking Injunction, then the court will use a form approved by the Board of District Court Judges to explain its reasoning.
Back to top
Although the respondent may ask for a hearing at any time after the 10 day time frame, it then becomes more difficult to contest the allegations because then the respondent has the burden to prove to the court why the stalking injunction should be dismissed.
The petitioner can ask the court to dismiss the temporary or permanent stalking injunction at any time. The respondent can ask to dismiss the temporary or permanent by requesting a hearing.
Back to top
A civil stalking injunction is a court order that tells the respondent that they may not stalk the petitioner, may not contact or go near the petitioner, and may not go near others who are listed in the injunction.
If the petitioner and respondent have children together, the order may also address child custody and parent-time issues to ensure the safety of the victim and any minor children. If the court issues a stalking injunction but decides not to address custody and parent-time issues, a copy of the stalking injunction shall be filed in any action in which custody and parent-time issues are being considered, and that court may modify the injunction to balance the parties' custody and parent-time rights.
A person who disobeys a civil stalking injunction may be arrested and prosecuted for the crime of stalking or may be held in contempt of court.
Back to top
A judge will grant the order that tells one person (respondent) to stop stalking another person (petitioner) if the respondent committed certain acts that constitute stalking.
Under Utah law, the respondent had to do the behavior two or more times, and in a way that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress or to be afraid for the person's own safety or the safety of someone else. See Utah Code Section 76-5-106.5 and 77-3a-101 to 103.
The prohibited conduct towards the petitioner would include either:
The respondent directly, indirectly, or through someone else did one of the following acts using any action, method, device, or means;
The respondent engaged in or caused someone else to engage in any of the following acts:
Back to top
Utah's Stalking Statute at Section 76–5–106.5 - Visit the website of the Utah Legislature to find out more out the definition of stalking. Also find the definition of "emotional distress" which “means significant mental or psychological suffering, whether or not medical or other professional treatment or counseling is required.”
Civil Stalking Injunction - Visit the website of the Utah Courts to find information about civil stalking injunctions and the respondent’s request for hearing. Learn more about what happens if the respondent does not request a hearing, a motion to dismiss is filed, or an appeal is filed after an adverse ruling in a civil stalking injunction case.
Back to top
Use the form above to request your free, confidential case evaluation. Our office will contact you as soon as possible to arrange for you to discuss the facts of your case with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Note: By submitting the above form, you are requesting a free and confidential consultation with one of our attorneys to discuss the specific facts of your case. We will evaluate your unique situation and provide you with valuable information about how an attorney may be able to help you. Please do not provide any confidential or time-sensitive information using this online contact form. If your situation is urgent, please call us at (801) 532-5297. We look forward to hearing from you.
The use of this form for communication with our personnel does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Mark has represented our son for over ten years. We have a difficult situation but we have never doubted that Mark, and now, Mike, care about him and our family. Their caring advice has been a lifeline for us.
Mike Holje was there for me and helped me get the charges dismissed. He was fantastic. I am so thankful for this firm.
Jim Bradshaw worked with me on a case and was helpful, realistic and very professional. I found him to be one of the best attorneys (and person) I have encountered.
I used Brown, Bradshaw & Moffat and would recommend them to anyone. Everyone in his or her office is kind, efficient and very responsive. You are treated respectfully and on an equal playing field.